Introduction
Overview
Improve legal review and decision-making. Legal systems depend on clarity, evidence, and accountability — yet many legal decisions are made behind a cloak of weak links and outsourced sensibility.
Clause & Effect
Dissect a provision into its component parts and test its logic against applicable legal principles.
Red Team Review
Map where legal-risk decisions are made inside an organisation — and how those responsibilities align with delegated authority.
Training
Practise explaining, escalating, or negotiating with AI personas that mirror real-world stakeholders.
Investigations
Independent analyses of contracts, processes, and regulatory interactions — exposing patterns of systemic error.
Library
Topic-organised references of annotated clauses, checklists, and workflows showing how reasoning and risk allocation operate in practice.
Tooling
Independent tools for improving the quality of law in practice. Customise or integrate them to identify dependencies and touch points across affected systems.
NTA combines investigations, diagnostic tools, and simulations to demonstrate what applied legal reasoning looks like — and to help organisations to foster resilient systems that encourage good practice, to understand and reconcile different interests and to detect where legal influence breaks down.